Drinking Age Essay Example for Free

Drinking Age EssayYou pack up totally your belongings, say farewell to your hometown and your parents, and tho like that, you start a whole new life that you have been looking forward to all your life. As you approach your first Friday night as a college freshman, you inevitably encounter the choice of deviation to your first college party and being able to drink without having to worry almost your curfew for the first time. Needless to say, you devise the decision to follow your floor-mates to a big party that they have been talking about for the whole week. modest inebriation situations like the above are common especially among college students. Under while drinking is currently primed(p) by an MLDA, or juristic lower limit drinking fester, of 21 throughout the United States. Despite this guileless and straightforward law, however, an abundant amount of irresponsible minor league tend to ignore this rule and continue to do what is ultimately an illegal action. Becau se of these ongoing actions, people have been questioning the law and whether or not the legal drinking age should be lowered.After a investigation of evidences and arguments, I firmly commit that the stripped-down legal drink age should be kept at 21 and not be lowered. ascribable to countless numbers of statistics, the social and physical effects, and the need to keep the boyisher teens away from alcoholic drink, it is safe to close up that keeping the drinking age at 21 is the best choice for our society. For more than 90 years, the national of legal drinking age have surfaced and caused controversy.Because of this, in that location have been many modifications to the law from lowering the minimum age to 18 to giving the choice to each state to increasing the national minimum age to 21. According to an article from Economic enquiry by Jeffrey A. Miron and Elina Tetelbaum, having all states to adopt an MLDA of 21 is regarded as an frightful contri saveion to life-saving ef fects such(prenominal) as decrease in driving fatalities among youths as well as in the number of binge drinking account.When the individual states were allowed to lower their MLDA from 21 to 18 between 1970 and 1976, in that respect were studies that claimed that traffic collisions and fatalities were increasing in states that lowered their MLDA. This helps to adjudge the assertion that lowering the MLDA didnt do much in lowering the number of traffic-related accidents, although it doesnt directly prove the fact that lowering the drinking age causes accidents.However, Dee, who uses state-level panel data and controls for state fixed effects, prove the point that there is a direct coefficient of correlation between the MLDA and the rate of traffic incidents. After years of studying the effects of different MLDAs, he substantiate that having an MLDA of 21 as a matter of fact reduces total traffic fatalities among 18-20 year olds by about 11%. Not still were there findings in t he reduction of traffic fatalities with an increased MLDA of 21, but there were similarly evidences that it helps to reduce the number of teen binge drinking as well.An article from the Journal of Ameri set up College Health indicated that cases of binge drinking, which is defined as five consecutive shots for men and 4 consecutive for women, has been reported more frequently among college students living in dorms. However, according to the Economic Inquiry, moving away from MLDA 18 has been tell to be associated with a reduction in heavy teen drinking of 8. 4%. They found that nationally increases in the MLDAreduced youth drinking by about four percent relative to exist levels (Miron).Overall, these findings in statistics help with the assertion that the drinking age should be kept at 21 for the minor league safeties. In addition to these statistics, there are in addition social reasons behind why the underage community should be forbidden to drink until they are 21. Accordin g to an article on the American Journal of exoteric Health, influences in underage drinking are contributing factors in unintentional social and health causes, such as sexual assault, violence, crime, overdose, and other related high-risk behavior.Since minors have not been honorabley true as adults mentally, they are more likely to make irresponsible actions when intoxicated. This may lead to undesirable affects that could potentially influence them for the rest of their lives, and hence actions need to be done in order to keep minors from the alcoholic influence. Also in opposition, there is no scientific evidence made to date that suggests a lower minimum drinking age would create conditions for responsible drinking or would lead young adults ages 18-20 years to make healthy decisions about drinking (Wechsler).Therefore, we have no solid claim to support the MLDA of 18, whereas we have more than enough justifications in saying that the MLDA should be kept at 21. Lastly, my sta nce on the minimum drinking age is supported by the mere fact that having a lower drinking age leave behind only cause the younger generations to be introduced to alcoholic beverages. An article from the Economic Inquiry points out when the MLDA is 18, more high school students have access to alcohol through peer networks.It is an unavoidable circumstance that if the MLDA lowers down to 18, typical high school seniors will have access to alcohol this can only mean that alcohol will be more accessible to high school underclassmen than if the MLDA is 21. This also means that, according the to the article, the law enforcement will have to monitor the drinking behavior of individuals aged 17 years and possibly youngernot only should this be an unnecessary action for law enforcement, but this is also a situation that allone should be concerned about.Giving teens easier access to alcohol will only deter them from growing to their full potential. The higher the MLDA, the less likelihood we have that the younger generation will have access to alcohol. That way, we will also have the benefit of a possible reduction in alcohol-related traffic fatalities and binge drinking rates among youths as well as prevention of them being socially and physically influenced by alcohol. Therefore, it makes more sense to keep the MLDA AT 21 if we do not privation the younger generations to have easier access to alcohol.Underage drinkingyou see it everywhere and hear about it every time. Having to listen to the news on the most recent car accident caused by a inebriate minor should not have to be a common thing if we implement the right actions. many another(prenominal) statistics out there evidently show that having a lower MLDA has a direct correlation to a higher chance of alcohol-related traffic fatalities as well as the rate of binge drinking amongst youths. Studies also show that underage drinking may lead to serious health or social causes to the minor, nearly of which incl ude sexual assault, violence, and overdose.Lastly, lowering the MLDA will only help the younger generations to have access to alcohol due to their high school peers. Overall, I believe that the safest and the best choice for our society is to keep the MLDA at 21 and not be any lowered than it is now. As the future leaders of the world, I believe that youths and minors should be grown in the safest, healthiest, and the most influence-free environment that will help them grow to their full potential when they can.