Science vs. Religion Essay -- Religious Science Creationism Essays

Science vs. morality Since the dawn of man, pieces involve striven to explain the many mysteries of the universe, and to justify our world in it. Throughout this journey of self-understanding, numerous standpoints on human reality have evolved and merged into a complex, abstract manifestation called righteousness. However, as the human race has grown and traveld itself, many ideas expressed by righteousness seem little and less plausible. Advances in acquaintance and technology have yielded a new breed of human thought that has disturbed and agitate the foundations of apparitional ideology. Our new, scientifically grounded understanding of the universe has unfolded a plethora of answers to age-old questions, which are antithetical to the explanations offered by religion. As strong scientific record has surfaced which is contrary to the prevailing religious view, open-minded believers have adapted their judgements accordingly, save many fundamentalists refuse to ac cept scientific evidence. This is the root of the dilemma surrounded by science and religion. Many philosophers and theists have offered their views concerning the ongoing battle between science and religion. Reconciliation between science and religion is impossible, because the claims made by religion and the evidence provided by science are so extraordinarily different. The advance of science has caused many theists to compromise traditional religious beliefs in target to facilitate scientific evidence, thus proving that scientific explanations of the universe are to a greater extent plausible than the rationales offered by religion. An excellent example of this can be seen in the question of the age of the planet Earth. According to religious theology, the Earth is less than ten thousand years old. However, there is an overwhelming amount of scientific evidence that proves the Earth to be many billions of years old. Many religious thinkers have responded to this evidence, by claiming that the methods used to ascertain the Earths age are inaccurate. They show that radioactive dating a widely accepted method of ascertain the age of didders, is inaccurate because there is no available rock ingest of a known age, which the method can be calibrated to. However, this line of reasoning is obsolete, because the only calibration required to find the age of a rock is the measurement of decay rates, which can be found in the science lab in... ...ith. Many theists point out that certain aspects of nature are in any case invisible, such as gravitational fields and magnetic fields (Foster 60). However, a parallel cannot be drawn between the invisibility of these natural phenomenons and the invisibility of god, because these aspects of nature can be measured. God, on the other hand, cannot be turn out to exist through empirical evidence. If scientific evidence exists that refutes the teachings of the bible, then why do quite a little believe in religion? pietism gives adult male a sense of security, a sense of individual purpose, and most importantly, brings people together. Arguably the most important aspects of any valid religion is its belief in a code of conduct, a set of moral teachings that destine how people should behave towards others. organized religion is one(a) of the major ways one generation passes on its values and morals to each succeeding generation. Religion has also been viewed as a way to control the masses. According to Karl Marx, Religion is the opium of the people (Microsoft Bookshelf CD-ROM 1998). Despite the scientific arguments that challenge the teachings of religion, religion forget always remain an institution in our society.