Theatre of the 21st Century

?Theatre of the 21st atomic number 6 should be aspect frontward, non looking back.\nDiscuss the to a higher place account in relative to the play you have seen in performance and with equalence to its received performance circumstances.\n\nIn discussing the statement Theatre of the 21st vitamin C should be looking forward, not looking back, it is demand to call for the statement from both(prenominal) a innovative and historic view to come to a conclusion. In this essay I impart weigh up set, lighting, acting and props and consider how these elements relate to the output signal of Julius Caesar that I saw in the Donmar store and how it compares to the pilot light production in the globe. Within this essay I will as well refer to the production at the Blackfriars indoor(a) playho recitation that was running at the same time alongside the globe. I will then be suitable to conclude whether theatre is really looking forward in the 21st century. \nThe Set of the product ion I saw of Julius Caesar was looking forward in term of theatre. The set depicted the metatheatrical notion with a necessary representational set. The play itself was set inside(a) a womans prison, a location that itself is modern and did not exist during the original performance. An example of how this was evident is with the use of the entire room world a dull tramp shade. The entrances and exits were cold white-haired(a) admixture doors that clanged when they were closed, this represented that the entire auditorium was a prison not clean the dot area. The use of grey metal poles around the stage and cold grey storey depicted the interior to a cell. The reason the director, Phyllida Lloyd, did this was to show her image and to make a touchy text more handy through modernising the production and make it relatable for the audience. This shows that the theatre is looking forward as such a setting in itself would not have been heard of in the original performance circ umstances. However, you could also argue that even t...